Difference between revisions of "Milmindani"
Milmindani (talk | contribs) |
Milmindani (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 164: | Line 164: | ||
Bond Distance: r(N-H)=1.01395Â<br> | Bond Distance: r(N-H)=1.01395Â<br> | ||
Bond Distance: r(N-CH<sub>3</sub>)=1.49638Â<br> | Bond Distance: r(N-CH<sub>3</sub>)=1.49638Â<br> | ||
| − | Bond Distance: r(N-Cl)=3. | + | Bond Distance: r(N-Cl)=3.64990Â<br> |
===Item Table=== | ===Item Table=== | ||
Revision as of 04:49, 15 May 2026
Contents
- 1 Observations
- 2 Question Answers and Tabulation
- 3 d.) Cl- Molecule Optimised Version
- 4 c.) HMim-Cl Molecule (Cl Attached to CH3 Optimised Version
- 5 b.) HMim-Cl Molecule (Cl Attached to C-H and CH3 Optimised Version
- 6 a.) HMim-Cl Molecule (Cl Attached to N-H-Cl Optimised Version
- 7 Me3NH-Cl Molecule Optimised Version
- 8 Me3NH-Cl Molecule Scanned Version
- 9 Bond Energy Calculations NH3BH3
- 10 NH3BH3 Molecule
- 11 BH3 Molecule
- 12 NH3 Molecule
- 13 Project Molecule N2F2
- 14 Lab1 Marking
Observations
Friday 2:45pm: The computers failed to run jobs to optimize and check the frequency of the HMim-Cl Molecule many times. This probably occurred over 10-15 times. I have retried over and over again and it has been unsuccessful so far. Friday 3:00pm: Molecule B Optimised. Friday 3:30pm: Still trouble with optimising A and C. CHanged methyl groups angle on A. Made sure no spaces in names and saved in D Drive. Friday 3:45pm: Molecule A Optimised.
Question Answers and Tabulation
Tabulate and compare all the H---Cl distances for all ion-pairs.
Molecule A
Bond Distance: r(H-Cl)=2.13353Â
Molecule B
Bond Distance: r(H-Cl)=2.13353Â
Molecule C
Bond Distance: r(H-Cl)=2.13353Â
how do the H-bonds of Me3NH and HMim compare?
Optimised bond distance and angle for Me3NH-Cl
Bond Distance: r(N-H)=1.16186Â
Bond Distance: r(N-Cl)=2.90049Â
Compared to Molecule B Optimised bond distance and angle for HMim-Cl Bond Distance: r(N-H)=1.01395Â Bond Distance: r(N-CH3)=1.49638Â Bond Distance: r(N-Cl)=3.14742Â
The N-CL bond is longer in HMim-Cl compared to Me3NH-Cl by 0.24693Â. The N-H bond is shorter in HMim-Cl compared to Me3NH-Cl by 0.14791Â.
how do the H-bonds of the N-H and C-H H-bonds compare?
are these distances representative of a H-bond? Hint compare your distances to the sum of the van der waals radii of H and Cl.
will the ionic nature of the ions effect a distance based assessment of H-bonding?
d.) Cl- Molecule Optimised Version
| name of submitted log file | DM CLMINUS.LOG |
| molecule | Cl- |
| method | B3LYP |
| Calculation Type | SP |
| calculation method | RB3LYP |
| basis set | 3-21G |
| charge | -1 |
| RMS gradient | 0.000000 |
| point group | OH |
| Confirmed it is Minima | Yes |
rotateable 3D Jmol image BH |
c.) HMim-Cl Molecule (Cl Attached to CH3 Optimised Version
| name of submitted log file | DM me3NHCL Optimisation.log |
| molecule | HMim-Cl (C4H7ClN2) |
| method | B3LYP |
| Calculation Type | FREQ |
| calculation method | RB3LYP |
| basis set | 3-21G |
| final energy | |
| RMS gradient | |
| point group | C1 |
| Confirmed it is Minima | Yes |
Media:DM me3NHCL Optimisation.log
rotateable 3D Jmol image BH |
Bond Distances
Optimised bond distance and angle for Me3NH-Cl
Bond Distance: r(N-H)=Â
Bond Distance: r(N-Cl)=Â
Item Table
Item Value Threshold Converged?
b.) HMim-Cl Molecule (Cl Attached to C-H and CH3 Optimised Version
| name of submitted log file | B-HMIM-CL-OPTIMISATION.LOG |
| molecule | HMim-Cl (C4H7ClN2) |
| Calculation Type | FREQ |
| method | B3LYP |
| calculation method | RB3LYP |
| basis set | 3-21G |
| final energy | -722.666200 |
| RMS gradient | 0.000014 |
| point group | C1 |
| Confirmed it is Minima | Yes |
Media:B-HMIM-CL-OPTIMISATION.LOG
rotateable 3D Jmol image BH |
Bond Distances
Optimised bond distance and angle for Me3NH-Cl
Bond Distance: r(N-H)=1.01395Â
Bond Distance: r(N-CH3)=1.49638Â
Bond Distance: r(N-Cl)=3.64990Â
Item Table
Item Value Threshold Converged? Maximum Force 0.000050 0.000450 YES RMS Force 0.000008 0.000300 YES Maximum Displacement 0.004359 0.001800 NO RMS Displacement 0.001247 0.001200 NO
a.) HMim-Cl Molecule (Cl Attached to N-H-Cl Optimised Version
| name of submitted log file | A HMIM CL OPTIMISATION.LOG |
| molecule | HMim-Cl (C4H7ClN2) |
| Calculation Type | FREQ |
| method | B3LYP |
| calculation method | RB3LYP |
| basis set | 3-21G |
| final energy | -722.687898 |
| RMS gradient | 0.000019 |
| point group | C1 |
| Confirmed it is Minima | Yes |
Media:A HMIM CL OPTIMISATION.LOG
rotateable 3D Jmol image BH |
Bond Distances
Optimised bond distance and angle for Me3NH-Cl
Bond Distance: r(N-H)=1.17721Â
Bond Distance: r(N-CH3)=1.47704Â
Bond Distance: r(N-Cl)=2.89156Â
Item Table
Item Value Threshold Converged? Maximum Force 0.000052 0.000450 YES RMS Force 0.000010 0.000300 YES Maximum Displacement 0.002398 0.001800 NO RMS Displacement 0.000450 0.001200 YES
Me3NH-Cl Molecule Optimised Version
Calculation Data
| name of submitted log file | DM me3NHCL Optimisation.log |
| molecule | Me3NH-Cl |
| method | FOPT |
| calculation method | |
| basis set | 3-21G(d,p) |
| final energy | -632.162045 |
| RMS gradient | 0.000394 |
| point group | C1 |
| Confirmed it is Minima | Yes |
Media:DM me3NHCL Optimisation.log
rotateable 3D Jmol image BH |
Bond Distances
Optimised bond distance and angle for Me3NH-Cl
Bond Distance: r(N-H)=1.16186Â
Bond Distance: r(N-Cl)=2.90049Â
Item Table
Item Value Threshold Converged? Maximum Force 0.000942 0.000015 NO RMS Force 0.000323 0.000010 NO Maximum Displacement 0.087442 0.000060 NO RMS Displacement 0.014422 0.000040 NO
Me3NH-Cl Molecule Scanned Version
Calculation Data
| name of submitted log file | DM me3NHCL RIGID SCAN.log |
| molecule | Me3NH-Cl |
| method | SCAN |
| calculation method | RB3LYP |
| basis set | 3-21G |
| final energy | -632.066188 |
| RMS gradient | Blank-No Gradient Listed |
| point group | C1 |
| Confirmed it is Minima | Yes |
Media:DM me3NHCL RIGID SCAN.log
rotateable 3D Jmol image BH |
Bond Distances
Optimised bond distance and angle for Me3NH-Cl
Bond Distance: r(N-H)=0.80000Â
Bond Distance: r(N-Cl)=3.20000Â
Scan of Total Energy
This is the total energy of the scanned molecule. It is a U-Shape. The Raw data is available below for your perusal.
File:Me3NHCl Scan of Total Energy Data.log
Bond Energy Calculations NH3BH3
Calculation Data
| E(NH3) | -56.557769 AU |
| E(BH3) | -26.615324 AU |
| E(NH3BH3) | -83.224689 AU |
| ΔE AU) | E(NH3BH3)-[E(NH3)+E(BH3)] = -83.224689 - (-56.557769+-26.615324) = -0.051596AU |
| ΔE Kj/mol) | -0.051596AU * 2625.4999 kJ/mol = 1 a.u. = -135.46529284 kJ/mol |
NH3BH3 Molecule
calculation data
| name of submitted log file | NH3BH3_Optimisation_Log_File.log.log |
| molecule | NH3BH3 |
| method | B3LYP |
| calculation method | RB3LYP |
| basis set | 6-31G(d,p) |
| final energy | -83.224689 |
| RMS gradient | 0.000001 |
| point group | C1 |
| Confirmed it is Minima | Yes |
Media:NH3BH3_Optimisation_Log_File.log.log
rotateable 3D Jmol image BH |
Item Table
Item Value Threshold Converged? Maximum Force 0.000002 0.000015 YES RMS Force 0.000001 0.000010 YES Maximum Displacement 0.000041 0.000060 YES RMS Displacement 0.000020 0.000040 YES
Important geometric parameters
Optimised bond distance and angle for BH3
Bond Distance: r(N-H)=1.01847Â
Bond Distance: r(B-H)=1.20977Â
Bond Distance: r(B-N)=1.66771Â
Bond Angle (N-H): 107.88°
Bond Angle (B-H): 113.88°
Low frequencies --- -3.6199 -0.0014 -0.0010 -0.0009 2.3908 4.5604 Low frequencies --- 263.4365 632.9747 638.4332
| Mode | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | |
| wavenumber (cm-1) | 263.4365 | 632.9747 | 638.4332 | 638.5054 | 1069.1617 | 1069.1617 | 1196.1866 | 1203.5225 | 1203.5771 | 1328.8170 | 1676.0434 | 1676.0577 | 2471.9811 | 2532.0716 | 2532.0950 | 3464.1021 | 3581.1459 | 3581.1541 | |
| Symmetry | A | A | A | A | A | A | A | A | A | A | A | A | A | A | A | A | A | A | |
| intensity (arbitrary units) | 0.0000 | 14.0108 | 3.5475 | 3.5464 | 40.5051 | 40.5105 | 108.9677 | 3.4694 | 3.4694 | 113.6226 | 27.5645 | 27.5669 | 67.2027 | 231.2478 | 231.2478 | 2.5113 | 27.9556 | 27.9571 |
BH3 Molecule
Calculation Data
| name of submitted log file | BH3 Optimisation DM.log |
| molecule | BH3 |
| method | B3LYP |
| calculation method | RB3LYP |
| basis set | 6-31G(d,p) |
| final energy | -26.615324 |
| RMS gradient | 0.000002 |
| point group | D3H |
| Confirmed it is Minima | Yes |
Media:BH3_Optimisation_Log_File.log.log
rotateable 3D Jmol image BH |
Item Table
Item Value Threshold Converged? Maximum Force 0.000004 0.000015 YES RMS Force 0.000003 0.000010 YES Maximum Displacement 0.000017 0.000060 YES RMS Displacement 0.000011 0.000040 YES
Important geometric parameters
Optimised bond distance and angle for BH3
Bond Distance: r(N-F)=1.19200Â
Bond Angle (N-F): 120°
Low frequencies --- -11.6940 -11.6861 -6.5543 -0.0002 0.0280 0.4289
Low frequencies --- 1162.9745 1213.1390 1213.1392
| Mode | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| wavenumber (cm-1) | 1162.9745 | 1213.1390 | 1213.1392 | 2582.5813 | 2715.7180 | 2715.7189 |
| Symmetry | A2" | E' | E' | A1' | E' | E' |
| intensity (arbitrary units) | 92.5282 | 14.0550 | 14.0544 | 0.0000 | 126.3320 | 126.3260 |
NH3 Molecule
calculation data
| name of submitted log file | NH3 Optimisation DM.log |
| molecule | NH3 |
| method | RB3LYP |
| basis set | 6-31G(d,p) |
| final energy | -56.557769 |
| RMS gradient | 0.000000 |
| point group | C3V |
Item Table
Item Value Threshold Converged? Maximum Force 0.000000 0.000015 YES RMS Force 0.000000 0.000010 YES Maximum Displacement 0.000003 0.000060 YES RMS Displacement 0.000001 0.000040 YES
Media:BH3_Optimisation_Log_File.log.log
rotateable 3D Jmol image NH |
Important geometric parameters
Optimised bond distance and angle for NH3
Bond Distance: r(N-H)=1.01797Â
Bond Angle: 37.12783°
Low frequencies --- -5.6864 -3.6131 -3.6124 0.0017 0.0048 0.0162
Low frequencies --- 1089.3674 1693.9284 1693.9284
| Mode | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| wavenumber (cm-1) | 1089.3674 | 1693.9284 | 1693.9284 | 3461.3788 | 3589.9285 | 3589.9285 |
| Symmetry | A1 | E | E | A1 | E | E |
| intensity (arbitrary units) | 145.4277 | 13.5571 | 13.5572 | 1.0593 | 0.2699 | 0.2699 |
| Charges | N-Atom | H-Atom | H-Atom | H-Atom |
| Charge | -1.125 | 0.375 | 0.375 | 0.375 |
Project Molecule N2F2
calculation data
| name of submitted log file | N2F2 MOLECULE 1 DM.log |
| molecule | N2F2 |
| method | RB3LYP |
| basis set | 6-31G(d,p) |
| final energy | -309.012413 |
| RMS gradient | 0.000000 |
| point group | C2V |
Item Table
Item Value Threshold Converged? Maximum Force 0.000001 0.000015 YES RMS Force 0.000000 0.000010 YES Maximum Displacement 0.000001 0.000060 YES RMS Displacement 0.000001 0.000040 YES
rotateable 3D Jmol image Nf |
Important geometric parameters
Optimised bond distance and angle for NH3
Bond Distance: r(N-F)=1.28000Â
Bond Distance: r(N=N)=1.23200Â
Bond Angle (N-F): 120°
Low frequencies --- 0.0013 0.0015 0.0017 3.2233 4.3533 5.0998
Low frequencies --- 347.8772 561.2472 771.6105
| Mode | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| wavenumber (cm-1) | 347.8772 | 561.2472 | 771.6105 | 949.4548 | 987.2543 | 1636.6075 |
| Symmetry | A1 | A2 | B2 | A1 | B2 | A1 |
| intensity (arbitrary units) | 0.6108 | 0.0000 | 74.7044 | 75.4125 | 81.1265 | 20.5391 |
| Charges | N-Atom | F-Atom | N-Atom | F-Atom |
| Charge | 0.191 | -0.191 | 0.191 | -0.191 |
Questions:
the molecule from the log file does not have bonds between the F and N atoms, what is going on here?
It does have bonds, you just need to change the number from 8 to 1 or 2 to see where the animation connects the bond together.
IR analysis
how many vibrations are expected from the 3N-6 rule?
The 3N-6 rule, calculates the number of vibrational modes in the molecule where N=the total number of atoms. As N2F2 has 4 atoms, N=4. So 3*(4)-6 = 6 vibrational modes are present in N2F2.
why are there only 4 peaks in the IR spectrum?
The molecule is symmetrical so although there are 6 vibrational modes, only 4 modes are visible because the symmetry of the molecule cancels dipole so they do not show up in an IR spectrum.
which vibration is the asymmetric N-F stretch?
The vibration at 775 cm-1 is the asymmetric N-F stretch.
what is the nature of the highest energy vibration?
This is the N=N stretch located at 1640 cm-1. The peak is small which is due to the tight N=N bond not moving that much.
MO analysis:
which MOs are core orbital MOs?
The 1S orbitals of both F atoms and the 1s orbitals of both N atoms. MO's 1-4.
provide a picture of MO 9 and beside it draw the LCAO diagram
Lab1 Marking
It's good that you have a working wiki. However, your reported image and charges of N2F2 do not correspond to an optimised structure. Don't forget to consider the accuracy to which you report your data the next time. If you have any queries, please contact Prof. Hunt.