User:Healyquin

From wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

lab marking

You have a good working wiki. It would be good if you round off reported values to correct significant figures. Reported angle of N2F2 is incorrect and value of energy reported is in hartree not kJ/mol. Overall a good attempt. If you have any specific questions, do email Prof. Hunt

NH3 Molecule

Calculation Data

Name of submitted log file Media:QH_NH3_OPT.LOG
Molecule NH3
Method RB3LYP
Basis Set 6-31G(d,p)
Final Energy (kJ/mol) -56.6
RMS Gradient 0.00000
Point Group C3v

Item Table

         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?
 Maximum Force            0.000000     0.000015     YES
 RMS     Force            0.000000     0.000010     YES
 Maximum Displacement     0.000003     0.000060     YES
 RMS     Displacement     0.000001     0.000040     YES

Optimized NH3 Molecule

RealNH3Molecule.PNG

Interactable NH Molecule

Important Geometric Parameters

Optimized Bond Distance for NH3
(N-H)=1.02Â
θ(H-N-H)=105°

IR/Vibration Frequencies of NH3

Low frequencies ---   -5.6864   -3.6131   -3.6124    0.0017    0.0048    0.0162
Low frequencies --- 1089.3674 1693.9284 
Mode 1 2 3 4 5 6
Wavenumber (cm-1) 1089 1694 1694 3461 3590 3590
Symmetry A1 E E A1 E E
Intensity 145 14 14 1 0 0

IRNH3.PNG

Charge Distribution: Table and Molecule

Atom Charge
Nitrogen -1.125
Hydrogens 0.375

ColourRangeNH3.PNG ChargeDisMoleNH3.PNG

Molecular Orbitals

MONH3.PNG

Project Molecule

N2F2m.PNG

Calculation Data

Name of submitted log file Media:QH_N2F2_OPT.LOG
Molecule N2F2
Method RB3LYP
Basis Set 6-31G(d,p)
Final Energy (kJ/mol) -309
RMS Gradient 0.000001
Point Group C2v

Item Table

        Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?
Maximum Force            0.000002     0.000015     YES
RMS     Force            0.000001     0.000010     YES
Maximum Displacement     0.000010     0.000060     YES
RMS     Displacement     0.000006     0.000040     YES

Optimized Bond Distances and Angle

(N-F)=1.39Â
(N-N)=1.22Â
θ(F-N-F)=79°
These optimized geometric parameters, confirm that the optimization of N2F2 took place.

Optimized N2F2 Molecule

OPTMoleofN2F2.PNG
There does not seem to be bonds between the N and F atoms of the optimized structure, possibly because they are too large (long) for the standard optimized bond size range to compute.

Interactable NF Molecule

IR/Vibration Frequencies and Analysis

Low frequencies ---   -0.0005    0.0015    0.0018    3.4936    4.3717    5.1617
Low frequencies ---  347.8732  561.2460  771.6039
Mode 1 2 3 4 5 6
Wavenumber (cm-1) 348 561 772 949 987 1637
Symmetry A1 A2 B2 A1 B2 A1
Intensity 1 0 75 75 81 21


There are 6 vibration modes of N2F2 because of 3N-6: 3(4) = 12 - 6 = 6
IRN2F2.PNG
As mode 1 and 2 have an intensity of ~0, they can't really be seen on the IR spectra, hence why you can only see 4 peaks. The vibration of the asymmetrical N-F stretch seems to be mode 3 (772cm-1) as both sides are stretching at different times. The highest energy vibration seems to be mode 6, where it is just the two N atoms stretching away and back towards each other (N=N stretch).

Charge Distribution: Table and Molecule

Atom Charge Colour
Nitrogen 0.215 Lime Green
Fluoride -0.215 Bright Red

CTN2F2.PNG CDF2N2.PNG
Fluorine is more electronegative (most electronegative element), hence why it has a greater negative charge than Nitrogen.

Molecular Orbitals

N2F2MO.PNG N2F2MO9.png
The core MOs, seem to be 1-4: 1 and 2 are the F atom core MOs. 3 and 4 are the N atom core MOs.